I’m not doing a year-in-review blog post, nor one about predictions for 2012. But one welcome change I’ve been seeing more and more about during the past several weeks is a focus among some indie authors on quality.
- Robert Bidinotto highlighted quality as a key reason for his fantastic Amazon success last month.
- Porter Anderson focused on a number of people starting to talk quality in last week’s Writing on the Ether.
- Reader Unboxed is reviewing indie authors along with traditionally published ones to try and raise the quality bar.
- Indie Book Collective members have mentioned a 2012 initiative in this vein, though no details are out yet.
My comment on last week’s Ether post was we’re through our teen rebellion phase and heading off to college. Depending on what genre you write, quality can have a different definition, or at least a different bar to clear. Still, there is a segment within the indie author community that realizes for this to be viable long-term, we need to make sure our books are at least as good as anything the traditional publishing houses are producing. That’s what it’s going to take to offset all the people who think indies are just a new version of vanity press desperation. (Don’t believe me? Check out Amazon’s Kindle Boards. It can get vicious over there.)
What does that mean? We need, as authors, to find good developmental editors. Contracting for copy editing, book covers and proofreading services all are fairly easy to find, and fairly standardized skill sets. But finding content editors, beta readers and critique partners/groups can be more difficult. We also need to find review channels that will consider indie books, such as Reader Unboxed. I love what Kathleen and Therese are doing there because they’re putting indie and traditional publishing side-by-side and letting the work stand or fall on its own merits. That’s the only way we, as authors, can get that reputation for quality is if we’re willing to hold ourselves (and let others hold us) to the same standard.
And part of it might mean adjusting expectations for output and for price. Going through editing and revisions takes time, as does writing well. Backlist is key to sales for indies, but unless you’re coming from a traditional publishing background, it’s going to take a while to build that backlist. That means patience. Lots of patience. Pricing is another challenge — some authors are now choosing to sell at a higher price because they think it signals to readers that the book is of higher quality. That’s different than the conventional wisdom that the way to indie success is 99-cent pricing.
2012 looks to be the year that the indie author community starts stratifying based on some of these issues. I’d like to think the quality writers will be the ones to find success — though we can only hope to see even half as good a run as Robert did — but there are so many other factors at play that nothing is for certain. That said, visibility is certainly one of the biggest hurdles for all indies. Getting recognized for quality is connected to how many people see your books.
So, to highlight some of the indie authors who are focusing on quality, which comes at the expense of quantity, I’ll be interviewing authors and posting them here. Hopefully, as with Robert’s insightful comments, we authors can all learn something about self-publishing our work and doing it well, and readers will get a chance to discover new authors who they can count on to produce good books. Stay tuned for first interview, probably in late January. And if you’ve read an indie book that you think falls into this category, email me at firstname.lastname@example.org or leave a note in comments. Authors, please don’t suggest yourself or ask your friends to do it. It’s tempting, but I think it defeats the purpose.